<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rupert Murdoch &amp; Newscorp&#8230;are you crazy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intelligentspeculator.net/investing_commentary/rupert-murdoch-newscorpare-you-crazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intelligentspeculator.net/investing_commentary/rupert-murdoch-newscorpare-you-crazy/</link>
	<description>Free stock picks and stock market commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:01:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.intelligentspeculator.net/investing_commentary/rupert-murdoch-newscorpare-you-crazy/comment-page-1/#comment-4105</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelligentspeculator.net/?p=1381#comment-4105</guid>
		<description>Exactly, who would be crazy to refuse tons of readers and traffic from Google. If so, Murdoch and News Corp are crazy enough, they can add a code in order to block google redirection and after, their websites will no longer appear in Google&#039;s search results huh? They have already started with WSJ. Like you said, WSJ have a &quot;client access&quot; only (for paying users). Instead of complaining, why not doing so with all their websites (fox or new york post or newsweek) and file closed? Anyways, by going on their websites , there are tons and tons of ads. Tons of ads = Moneyyyyy!! 

I think Murdoch has an old-view of internet. This is the 21st century and things are continuing to evolve rapidly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, who would be crazy to refuse tons of readers and traffic from Google. If so, Murdoch and News Corp are crazy enough, they can add a code in order to block google redirection and after, their websites will no longer appear in Google&#8217;s search results huh? They have already started with WSJ. Like you said, WSJ have a &#8220;client access&#8221; only (for paying users). Instead of complaining, why not doing so with all their websites (fox or new york post or newsweek) and file closed? Anyways, by going on their websites , there are tons and tons of ads. Tons of ads = Moneyyyyy!! </p>
<p>I think Murdoch has an old-view of internet. This is the 21st century and things are continuing to evolve rapidly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
