Archive for November, 2009

The Next Google… Facebook? Twitter? Linkedin?

By: IS | Date posted: 11.20.2009 (5:00 am)

google-logoDo you remember a few years ago, in 2004 when a young little known company named Google decided to become public through an IPO. It generated a lot of interest with users racing to buy shares. The shares were offered at an auction and the final IPO price was 85$USD. To many, it seemed like a major bargain. But to others, the 85$USD was silly for a company that showed little ability to generate income.

facebook_v_linkedinThe first day the stock actually traded, August 19th 2004, it actually jumped about 20% and finished over 100$. After that, it never looked back. Sure Google did not always rise and did have some tougher moments. But overall, it is still a dream for most investors. Every stock is now worth close to 600$ and there is still a lot growth with UBS releasing a 700$ target price just yesterday.

So the question of course now is how to find the next one. The three main names being mentionned so far have been Facebook, Twitter and Linkedin. All 3 companies are rumored to be thinking about going public. When I talk about going public, it means that their shares can be purchased on the stock exchange. But as a sidenote, there are already ways to buy some shares, from those lucky ones who own shares already (either privaate investors or employees generally). Secondmarket and SharesPost are two of the companies that already offer this possibility.

birdandt_tcm18-151058Over the next 3 weeks, we will go into a little more detail into the current valuation of the three internet companies.  Facebook has been the most talked about one as its owner has even confirmed that at “some point”, Facebook will certainly be going public. There have also been more rounds of funding and recent transactions have set the value of a share at 21$, thus putting the company value at $9.5B!!!

Too high? I’ll give my view on that next week but let’s just say that I remember a lot of investors thinking it was crazy to pay 85$ for a share of Google.  So don’t dismiss the IPO too quickly.

facebook-com-twitter-com-linke_uv_1y

Yahoo…buy or sell?

By: IS | Date posted: 11.18.2009 (5:00 am)

yhooAs you know, I do trades mainly in the technology field and I do have a screen that helps me follow the action for 20-25 companies that I trade on. Over the past few years, Yahoo has been one of the more interesting names to trade for a few reasons:

-It is in the very dynamic search industry

-It competes with tech companies such as Google, Microsoft and IAC Interactive.

-It is fairly easy to get indications of market share for Yahoo as well as get a good idea what kind of revenues the company is pulling in

-There was also a lot of speculation about the stock and the discussions Microsoft had to buy the company. As well, Yahoo has always been a content company. While search has been its main focus, it still generates a decent amount of traffic through all of its content properties.

But since Yahoo did its search deal with Microsoft, I simply have been unable to get a clear view on the company. It is unclear to me what Yahoo’s core now represents. It would not be search as it has basically given up on that in order to help Microsoft’s Bing. But is Yahoo’s profitability now linked so much to Microsoft that I should consider Bing’s recent signs of success over Google as a positive for Yahoo? I doubt it strongly. In my opinion, Microsoft is the major winner here, not Yahoo!.

So Yahoo has been refocusing and most of what we’ve heard has been centered on cost cutting. That is great and will certainly help profits in the short term, but how much costs can Yahoo cut? And in a technology company, I would expect profits to be driven by rising revenues, not dropping costs.

Many of Yahoo’s properties are not showing growth. While it used to be the leader in finances, dating, email, sports, it is no longer in all of these categories. It just seems as though Yahoo was involved in so many areas that it stopped improving its page or at least did not do so at the speed of its competitors. Because of that, Yahoo has been losing ground in almost all of its markets/properties.

yahoo-com-google-com-bing-com_uv_6m

More on this topic (What's this?)
Yahoo’s New CEO Can’t Save The Sinking Ship
Read more on Yahoo!, Microsoft at Wikinvest

New Trade: Long Priceline(PCLN) vs Short Travelzoo(TZOO)

By: IS | Date posted: 11.16.2009 (5:00 am)

pclnOver the weekend, I had more time to go over some numbers while looking for the next (hopefully) winning trade. Just a few days ago, I closed out a trade that involved a play on travel, Ctrip vs Expedia. There are two other names that I follow closely and I am now picking them for my next trade. It is rather ironic for me to go short on Travelzoo given the fact that I have used the service considerably and still like to visit their website.

But the fact is that Travelzoo has gained 174% in the past year and looks overvalued in my opinion, especially compared to what most consider to be the leader in the field, Priceline.com. Even thouggh Priceline has been there for a long time, it still shows impressive growth and in fact seems to be gaining both more traffic and more revenue than Travelzoo. You can take a look at Compete’s traffic data for the past 12 months (see graph at the bottom of this post). Travelzoo is up 36% while Expedia shows a 44% improvement.

In my opinion, Travelzoo’s model is great for many customers, especially those who do not know exactly where they are headed and are simply looking for the best deal around. They do have a strong business relationship but there are 2 problems:

-It is difficult to translate those visits into revenues
-The business is not as scalable as Priceline’s business.

tzooOne good way to prove my point is to look at Travelzoo’s margins. They do not seem to improve much over time as it seems that every dollar revenue also comes with extra costs. The profitability of the company has therefore not improved much over time. Part of it was because Travelzoo was trying to expand overseas and some of those entures failed miserably. In fact, Travelzoo announced it was closing its Asian operations.

On the other side, Priceline continues to build a strong brand and to appeal to the US consumer, its main focus.

Just take a quick look at these sales growth numbers over the past few years and you can see exactly what I mean

Travelzoo Sales growth:

2004: 87.20%
2005: 50.75%
2006: 36.94%
2007: 13.50%
2008: 3.16%

Priceline Sales growth:

2004: 5.87%
2005: 5.28%
2006: 16.67%
2007: 25.49%
2008: 33.73%

These companies are going into opposite directions. So the question that remains is if their pricings represent that fact correctly and in my opinion they do not:

Bloomberg estimates the earnings for the current year by Travelzoo to be .305$ while Priceline has an earnings estimate of 10.195$. The Price Earnings for next year are much higher for Travelzoo which in my opinion simply does not make sense.

priceline-com-travelzoo-com_uv_1y

Disclaimer: No return is guaranteed and each recommendation should be considered within the investor’s individual situation. As with any financial investment, there are risks involved.

Financial Ramblings

By: IS | Date posted: 11.15.2009 (10:37 am)

the_power_of_dreams_by_donjukiI hope you are all enjoying a good weekend! Here are some of the better readings that I enjoyed this week:)

-Congrats to TFB for hitting 100K in income at age 28!
-Limiting beliefs about money @ MillionDollarJourney
-Are you as leveraged as Goldman Sachs @ GatherLittlebyLittle
-Wealth and happiness @ RedeemingRiches
-Find some H1N1 flu stocks @ BuyMyStockPicks
-Should the government bail out pension plans? @ FourPillars
-How Oil speculation affects oil prices @ ZeroHedge

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Oil at Wikinvest

What makes an ETF “successful” ?

By: IS | Date posted: 11.13.2009 (5:00 am)
etf-financial-servicesAre there too many ETF’s? No, there are not …


I hear it all the time, investors complaining about the overwhelming number of ETF’s that are available on the markets. Yes, I admit, there are many, and it can become confusing as for one index, there can be 5 or 6 ETF’s, and sometimes many more. I would say that it is still fairly easy to decide which ETF you should invest in. Simply follow the 6 rules of how to choose an ETF.

But the more important issue here is that investors should be happy about having so many companies competing for their money. This has a major impact on fees that companies can charge and in the end the investors come out on top. I do believe that in the end, there will not be as many companies offering ETF’s. It is a much more difficult business than most companies realize.

To be certain, it is an attractive business. Imagine running a business that requires little maintenance and that can generate .20% of assets… that is as good as it gets. For example, Ishares has about $37 billions outstanding on EEM, and charges .72% of annual fees. That represents over $260,000,000. Now yes, of course there are costs involved. But you would think that the business is still able to pull in a good amount of profits every year.

And so companies all around the world have been thinking about ways to get into the game. Of course, it is a lot trickier than most people can imagine.

First off, to make an ETF attractive, you need to make it:

-Cheap: Obviously, one of the more important aspects is the annual fee. The lower it is, the better the chances of       attracting funds

-High volume: Attracting investors requires having a liquid, high volume stock that will give investors the possibility  of trading without excessive costs

That leaves companies with the challenge of creating an ETF that can become big enough to be profitable. Generally, they will need an ETF that:

-Differentiates from existing ones: The ETF must either track something new, a new index or in a new way. If it doesn’t, then it must offer something better than existing ones, usually lower fees
-Is popular: Yes, you read me right. Popularity is hugely important. If investors are looking for liquid and high volume stocks, how will they ever start investing in a new ETF that has no volume or active traders? It is a vicious circle and there are a few ways to get around it, but it is the most expensive and most overlooked part of the business:

-There has to be some institutional investors that trade the name or at least offer fairly thin bid-ask spreads


-There must be some marketing done to get more investors trading


Both of these end up being very expensive but they are necessary expenses until you have enough buyers and sellers every day to insure tight spreads and high volumes. Once that happens, the company can work on getting more flows that will result in more fees and more profits. It seems very simple, but actually the majority of ETF’s never reach that point and will end either closing or being unprofitable for years….

More on this topic (What's this?)
Measuring the Performance of the Ivy Portfolio
What is a Short Gold ETF?
Read more on Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) at Wikinvest

Closing CTRP vs EXPE

By: IS | Date posted: 11.12.2009 (4:14 pm)

ctrpQuick post to confirm that I will be closing out the trade on CTRP vs EXPE, as it has a +22,30% return as of today’s close. This is because of CTRP’s earnings announcements that surprised analysts to the upside. Income from operations is up 87% on revenues that increased 40%. Quite impressive from the online Chinese travel company and that was enough for shares to jump today while Expedia remained steady.

Other trades remained fairly stable:

AAPL-INTC
+7,94%
GOOG-IACI +8,49%
BIDU-AMZN +4,64%

All for now! A new trade should be coming on Monday.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Ctrip.com: Is This Risky Stock Worth It?
Read more on Ctrip.com International, Expedia at Wikinvest