Archive for July, 2009

New trade: Long Canada(EWC) – Short Russia(RWX)

By: IS | Date posted: 07.31.2009 (5:00 am)

CB013152Russia has been at the center of attention in the past few months because of its major collapse. It’s no secret, Russia’s economy is centered more than perhaps any other major nation around oil. The recent recession hit hard in Russia as it decreased demand and prices. Recently, Russia has been on the defensive as it defends itself on many fronts. Most recently, US Vice-President Joe Biden spoke very openly about Russia’s demographic problems and about its impact over the next few years. While some countries such as Japan have been acting to improve their long term prospects, it seems as though Russia has so many problems that it does not quite know where to put its energy. You can read very interesting article about Russia’s demographic problems.

Another more short term problem for Russia is that its main customer, Europe is in very bad shape, a lot worse than the US in many respects and this could affect the Russian economy as it still depends on exports (as does Canada) for a major part of its economy.

While I do agree that energy prices will rebound and would fear being short Russia, I think that Canada will profit as well from a bump in natural gas and oil prices and overall has a much better current situation. As well, seeing Russia up almost twice the growth of the Canadian market so far in 2009 gives me a good feeling that this will be a promising trade.

The danger of course is that Russia being in many ways an emerging economy, its stock market might enjoy more growth in a context where the world economy would pick up. But since we still do believe that the recovery will be slow, we expect Canada to fare better.

So there you have it, Long EWC (Ishares Canada), Short RSX (Market Vectors, Russia)

rsxewc

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Investing in Russia at Wikinvest

Yahoo(YHOO) is “almost” officially toast..

By: IS | Date posted: 07.29.2009 (5:00 am)

yahoo_logoYahoo, once the dominant force on the internet, has been losing ground for years now and it looks to take the final downturn. A few months ago only, Microsoft was almost begging Yahoo to join it in the competition against the might Google. Yahoo refused time and time again refusing offers that are now almost 100% higher than the actual price of Yahoo(YHOO). With Microsoft’s recent launch of Bing, it is becomming increasingly clear that Yahoo’s search business is in major trouble as it continues to lose market share, especially to the new Microsoft’s search engine.

It is now being reported that a new search deal is almost done. Among other things, this deal would set Bing as the search engine used by Yahoo. My question of course is what Yahoo will be focusing on if it cannot even have its own search engine. Other segments of the company such as dating and stores have also been losing market share to the point where it is unclear what Yahoo will look like one or two years from now.  As part of the deal, Yahoo would retain most the sales responsibility for the new merged business. But in a world where Google is by far the dominant player, I doubt a few extra salesman will be what takes Yahoo to the next level.

Yahoo is currently up on the news in after hours trading and it might last for some time but I do think that this deal will hurt Yahoo in the long term, especially since this time around, Yahoo came into the negotiations in a position of weakness, a major difference from the last few times such discussions took place.

Oh and did I meantion that this deal will without any doubt be under scrutiny by the Department of Justice as this deal will take out on of the very few big players in online advertising. It probably will still get done but this will cost money, focus and time.

Does Yahoo look bad for not following Carl Icanh’s advice a few months ago when they could sell their company for over 30$ per share? Amazing isn’t it… Just name one good and promising part of Yahoo right now??? Yes, exactly, I didn’t think you’d come up with one.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Yahoo and Microsoft Again
Read more on Yahoo!, Microsoft at Wikinvest

So your employer owes you $100M….

By: IS | Date posted: 07.26.2009 (5:00 am)

hallCertainly an interesting debate and one that I have discussed in the past. Compensation discussions are too often simplified and things are often a lot more complex than could be thought initially.  The man on the left,  Andrew J. Hall, heads Citigroup’s energy-trading unit, Phibro LLC. There is currently a major discussion between him and the now government ran Citigroup. It’s easy to imagine Citigroup’s argument. They say that giving him $100 millions will draw a lot of public attention and bring back a lot of debates similar to what was said about AIG compensation and they do of course have a point. Signing a bonus check for $100 millions could easily make headlines and put Barack Obama and other public officials in hot water.

Sure Mr. Hall needs the money to help maintain his 1000 year-old castle in Germany as well as his impressive art collection. But somehow, I can’t imagine that would draw very much public sympathy. The problem of course is that all of this is very short sighted.

The government, and thus by default the US population, is now the #1 shareholder of Citibank. If Citibank can hire someone on the promise of giving him 10% of his earnings, doesn’t that sound like a great deal? It would certainly look to me like that would help Citi repay its debt a lot quicker. And so of course, this person is hired and thanks to huge success and a great team, the unit managed by this person generates $1 billion.The issue then becomes if you can afford to pay the bonus. And by afford, I mean defending the payout to the American public.

Now, in this specific case, a lot of the media focus is about Citigroup being in such a bad shape financially that it perhaps cannot afford to pay out Mr. Hall’s payout. To me, the real question is if Citigroup can afford to NOT pay this bonus. In my opinion, not paying the bonus and not being able to go ahead of its shareholders to explain would certainly make things a lot more difficult in the future. The type of people that can generate this much money will not take a chance on a company if they believe that the bonus they are owed will not be paid.

There are a lot of alternatives of course and one of them is for Citigroup to “spin off” the unit and thus reward Mr Hall’s new firm by paying it a percentage of its gains. Then of course, it would the firm paying a $100M bonus instead of Citigroup. That solution of course would create less outrage but it’s a shame if we really need to do so many actions to hide what is simply the reality… that Mr Hall deserves his big payout.

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Citigroup at Wikinvest

Financial Ramblings

By: IS | Date posted: 07.25.2009 (5:00 am)

66_new1Another week comes to an end with hopefully some better weather in store.. summer is halfway done, unbelievable isn’t it?? Lots of action this week in terms of earnings and M&A activity, so lots of good readings to choose from. Here is my selection of the best ones!

-First off, a very very cool story from TheFinancialBlogger .. like he says, money doesn’t buy happiness but it sure helps create magic moments!
-Thinking of buying a new property? Read this guide to the top mistakes by GLBL!
-Think now is the right time to jump in the market..? Read about two overbought sectors.
-Scarrrrry… the bailout cost $23.7 billions?
-Interesting article by MDJ about doing research towards the purchase of a car!
-This might be the path towards good investments, US government investing in battery powered cars.
-Credit Card Changes: 5 ways to protect yourself
-USO has not been the reason I am leading the stock competition so I’m thrilled to hear others trading on it, see a short put strategy here.
-Canadian Capitalist looks into the equity premium, interesting view!
-Microsoft’s profit and sales tumble.. is it the end???
-Warren Buffet’s 3 investment rules for the ordinary investor!

A match made for heaven or for hell? Amazon(AMZN) buys Zappos

By: IS | Date posted: 07.24.2009 (5:00 am)

zapposI must say I’m shocked. I glanced at my screen and looked with interest at a news release about Amazon.com (AMZN) buying Zappos.com for about 928$ millions USD. To most non-Americans, Zappos is completely unknown. But in fact, the website was a small but fast growing competitor to Amazon. How is a shoe and clothes retailer competition to the specialised book retailer? Simply because Amazon has already said it believed that it could sell anything to anyone at some point in the future. The strength of Amazon lies in its powerful distribution network. Zappos on the other hand is much smaller but has experienced impressive growth thanks to what is probably the best customer service, online or even offline.

Is it logical for these two companies to unite? In some way yes as there is no doubt that Zappos will be a lot more efficient if they are able to profit from the leverage they will now have. They are supposed to remain two independent companies but you would amazon_cravethink for example that this merger would help Zappos gain a more important presence internationally very fast. They are now joining with one of two big ecommerce companies in the world (with Netflix) and that is certainly a positive.

The one issue I have is that while Zappos was a private company, it was able to do a lot that was geared towards the long term, mostly actions geared towards their customer service. Even though they say nothing will change, Amazon is a public company that does have very high expectations and after missing its earnings this week, analysts will be looking into the impact of Zappos in the next few quarters of earnings. It will be interesting to see if this will create a clash of cultures. The management of Zappos has confirmed it was staying on board which is certainly a positive and will help to keep the strong company structure as well as keep employee retention.

As you can see in the video below this post, I do agree with the idea that Zappos will be able to learn a lot from Amazon’s experience in ecommerce and shipping worldwide. Even having the Amazon founder come out with a Youtube video, done while wearing jeans, will probably go a long way in showing Zappos employees how the values of the two companies are perhaps not as different as many could think. This will also certainly reassure the loyal and passionate Zappos customers about where their loved company is now headed.

You can also see a video from Amazon’s founder about the story of Amazon as well as the acquisition:

At the knees of your competition

By: IS | Date posted: 07.22.2009 (5:00 am)

apple-new-logo-lg1Things could not be going better for Apple right? It just announced earnings that have once again beat earning estimates thanks to very strong sales of both Iphones and Mac computers. In after market trading, Apple’s stock gained about 4,5% as its highest margin product, the Iphone, pushed earnings higher. But all if not perfect in Apple world. In fact, it looks like it is not appreciative of Microsoft’s recent tv ads, that attack the higher price of Mac computers.

In fact, Microsoft’s COO Kevin Turner has even been asked to stop running the ads by Apple’s legal team according to a recent interview in PC World. Quite a request don’t you think? They demanded the ads stop saying that Apple’s computers were now priced 100$ lower making the ads non-justified.  His reaction? “It was the greatest single phone call in the history that I’ve ever taken in business.” And he is absolutely right. If these ads are indeed getting the attention of consumers and pointing them to the fact that they can get as good of a computer for a lower price, then Microsoft should be buying a lot more airtime.

Personally, I am surprised to see Apple on the defensive about this. Apple consumers are generally known to go towards the brand for all kinds of reasons, but price is rarely if ever one of those. And because of that, I would not have expected these ads to have much of an impact but if Apple even went as far as asking Microsoft, there is clearly something going on with the campaign.

microsoft-logoShould competitors ever ask themselves to stop attacking each other? Certainly does not sound like something a company would even consider in a capitalist world but that seems to be exactly what happened. I truly wonder if others such as Coca-Cola and Pepsi for example have ever had such discussions. I can’t imagine Microsoft ever deciding to stop a campaign for that reason, could you? Apple’s response is that Microsoft is giving false information quoting prices that are no longer accurate. Should such ads be allowed to go on? From the ads that I have seen, I don’t think there is any issue because Microsoft is simply saying that the Mac products are more expensive, which is…true.