Archive for February, 2009

Investment Talking

By: IS | Date posted: 02.28.2009 (7:03 am)

Every Saturday, The Intelligent Speculator does a review of good read around the blogosphere. Here’s what caught my attention this week:



The Digerati Life talks about investment opportunities upon economic recovery.


Canadian Capitalist tells us a lesson from the Japanese Stocks.


Write a put, buy a put by Where Does All My Money Go.


Another interesting article about Leverage ETF’s by Zach Stocks. Definitely, you should read more about them before trading such financial product!


Thinking the market will collapse? Try learning how to short stocks at The Wild Investor.



Ebay’s Relative Value posted at Wide Moat Investing.


The Ultimate Stock For A Recession posted at The Penny Daily


Quick Take: SOHU.com posted at MagicDiligence.


KMB: Stock Analysis for Dividend Growth Portfolio posted at Dividend Tree.


Wells Fargo: Things May Not Be Well at Wells posted at Dividends Value


Are Canadian Bank dividends safe? posted at Financial Highway.


Carnivals:


Carnival of Personal Finance


Festival of Stocks


Carnival of Money Hacks


More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Investing in Canada at Wikinvest

Cloud Computing… the next big thing

By: IS | Date posted: 02.27.2009 (4:00 am)

Technology is a wonderful thing of course in that it improves productivity and one of the leading changes is the arrival of cloud computing. Nice name isn’t it? Actually cloud computing is quite a simple concept in that it only means internet based software. So instead of opening an excel spreadsheet, you connect to the internet and open a program from your internet browser. The most obvious example is the difference between Microsoft Office and Google documents. On one hand you have Microsoft that has a group of programs namely Excel, word, Powerpoint, etc. But cloud computing is probably something you already use. When is the last time you downloaded Google Maps on your computer? Never of course as you can use it from your browser.

Here are the main aspects i see in such traditional software:

-Usually Purchased physically (cd, etc)
-One time purchase
-New program versions are an incentive to buy a new cd
-Bugs must be repaired through patches, downloads, etc.
-Backups necessary

Compare that to Cloud programs:

-Usually would be paid monthly or annually
-Generally no upgrades necessary
-No support required as any fixes or batches will be made for the user
-Accessible from anywhere that has internet access (increasingly anywhere)

You can see how from the user perspective, there are many advantages in cloud computing because there is less support necessary and no upfront payments. The major advantage of course is that in such an offering, there is almost no limits to the flexibility that can be offered. A small company could purchase only the parts of a software that it will really use, could change its number of licences daily or modify its requirements. And generally, in cloud computing, you can be charged for what you really use, not so much for what you think you will be using a few months in advance when you negotiate with your software provider.

With all of that said, the real question is how to profit from this trend and to me right now it is not clear at all. We are in the opening minutes of this game. Google might be the obvious leader but Microsoft is also pushing hard to catch up and obviously has a lot of advatanges from its dominating existing software. And let’s not focus only on the Microsoft suite as there are countless different software types in specialised fields. To give an example, in the Finance software field, Bloomberg is heads and shoulders above anyone else. But who says a web based company could not provide a comparable service that could be offered at a lesser cost than the 3,000$/month generally charged for a Bloomberg licence.

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on Cloud Computing, The Internet Impact at Wikinvest

Long Ebay/Short Knot

By: IS | Date posted: 02.25.2009 (4:00 am)

logoebay_x45The current economic conditions continue to provide many opportunities in terms of mispriced stocks in my opinion and I’m now ready to enter into a new trade with two securities I’ve traded in the past although not through the current pair. I’m firstly going Long Ebay simply on terms of valuation. Honestly, seeing Ebay trade in single digit P/E’s makes no sense to me. However, given the current dislike from the market towards Ebay, this trade could have a tougher start than others. Ebay has a fairly stable market, little competition and makes most of its earnings through fixed and variable fees on sold items. On all accounts, you would think that the main threat to Ebay’s earnings would be a big competitor joining the game and taking away market share. While it is not a done battle, so far Ebay seems to be fighting hard and they are fairly diversified in that field with stakes in many smaller players.

knotebay

It is still unclear how Skype fits in the overall Ebay picture, mostly as to how it will be able to make money out of it. The recent news about Nokia creating phones that will support Skype is a step in the right direction although I would not count on it yet. And again, Paypal, the online payment solution by Ebay seems to be discounted. It has a very important position in the market and again is far from being challenged right now giving us hope that the very tough ride of Ebay stock might be coming towards an end…

theknotOn the other hand is Knot, the company behind theknot.com, a wedding website that is basically a media company, mostly online but it also has offline publications, all geared towards the market of young (and not so young)

couples wishing and planning to get married. Of course, the problem is the very public problems for media companies in this slowdown as companies in every sector of the economy cut down on their advertising budgets. Many offline publications have gone on the road of bankruptcy and it’s difficult to imagine that Knot will be able to come out untouched from this tough perio

d. It certainly is a leader in its niche but so is Ebay and I would expect advertising budgets to be affected a lot more than fees such as the ones that Ebay receives.

The downward risks that I see in this trade short term are mostly related to bad news about Ebay’s traffic or number of transactions. An always existing risk of course for Ebay is also the announcement of a new competitor for Paypal, something that is always possible but in recent years there has been less rumors about this and you would think that few companies would have the necessary skills and budget to enter this market.

Disclaimer: I hold no positions on Ebay or Knot

More on this topic (What's this?)
Make money on Ebay.
Read more on EBay, XO Group Inc at Wikinvest

When investing becomes a big giant gamble

By: IS | Date posted: 02.23.2009 (4:00 am)

I wrote last week about how playing Bank of America was almost like going to the casino and indeed this week that is pretty much what it turned into with giant swings. Just today, Bank of America was down 30% at one point and finished the day about 2,5% down.

The current environment has been truly amazing to me. But the current environment has been tough psychologically for investors all around the world. Recently, investors have been gravitating towards two main feelings; fear and hope.  Which is worse? In my opinion, both can have tragic impacts on a portfolio.

And unfortunately, many investors are making critical mistakes because of both feelings. Fear will usually tend to get investors to sell their investments and often act with panic. As any financial advisor or specialist would tell you, panic is probably the worst feeling you could have while trading. The most important thing is to remain down to earth. While investors that got out probably will suffer less losses, they will most likely also miss the stock rebound as usually happens in such cases and so they end up losing more.

A more dangerous feeling however might be hope. Why? Because hope tends to get investors excited and into taking more risks than warranted. I’ve seen several cases of investors thinking they know when rock bottom has occured. How bad can it get? Imagine investors that a few months ago decided to get into the action big time. So if you have no money, how can you do it? You can open a margin account at your bank. Then, send money from that account to a trading margin account and invest. Basically, you can be trading 50-60K without having put a dime of capital. And then things turn bad. If you suffer a loss of 20% (very possible in this environment), then you have actually lost 12K… and at one point, the loss becomes more psychological than anything else. And instead of investing with your head, you are always looking for homeruns, for that one trade that will help you get back into profit territory, and that’s when things usually get even worse… Read any trading book and they will all tell you, the most difficult aspect of trading has never, and will never be the technical aspect. It’s always about sticking to your system when things go bad or when they go too bad…

Unfortunately, I think such mistakes can have very long term impacts. If you are a speculative investor, set aside money, an amount that you can lose, and separate that amount from any retirement fund or any other specific goal that you might have. And use discipline. If you have reached your “stop loss”, get out of the market. Don’t all of these also apply to visiting a casino? Told you.. these days, for most investos, the difference is minimal between the two…

Investment Talking

By: admin | Date posted: 02.21.2009 (7:39 am)

Every Saturday, The Intelligent Speculator does a review of good read around the blogosphere. Here’s what caught my attention this week:

Canadian Capitalist makes a review of CIBC Index Mutual Funds.

The Dividend Guy Blog shows how to use Stock Screens and talks about his own criterions.

Zach is talking about Obama’s plan for homeowner affordability and stability. Hopefully it will gives a little push to the economy and the market!

The Wild Investor takes another look at Netflix.

The Smarter Wallet presents 5 Stock Sectors To Avoid In A Recession posted at The Smarter Wallet

Primus Guaranty (PRS) Earnings Notes posted at College Analysts.

Fundamentals vs Technical posted at The Sun’s Financial Diary.

Do not use a Leveraged ETF for Hedging posted at OneMint.

Dividends4Life presents Stock Analysis: BP Plc (BP)

Investing School presents 30 Components of The Dow Jones Industrial Average Index

IACI actually makes a good move

By: admin | Date posted: 02.20.2009 (4:00 am)

matchIAC Interactive, a company I shorted with success (vs Google) on a January 23rd trade is involved in several internet businesses that are seeing a major slowdown, especially in the finance sector but also in dating and its main property is Match.com, one of the main internet dating properties. The problem of course is not caused by the lack of users. There is arguably more and more internet users looking for love online every day and as such it certainly looks like a great business in theory. The problem of course is that there exists an increasing number of ways to get this done without paying any fees.

Users can now use social networks such as Myspace or Facebook to look for prospective lovers. And there are even some very important dating sites that do not use paid memberships as a business model. One of the sources I use to get information about the business of online dating is on the blog of the founder of PlentyofFish, arguably the most important free dating website in North America. He has written about how even Match.com has launched (although under another name), a free dating service. And the industry is certainly going through important changes. While leaner companies such as PlentyofFish are able to live off of advertising income because of a low cost structure, others such as Yahoo!, Match.com, etc are finding it a lot more difficult. And there is no question why in my opinion. They have a lot more resources than needed in most cases. Look at Match.com and you will see they have offices in Dallas (Headquarters), Beijing, London, Madrid, Munich, Paris, Stockholm and Tokyo. Say what? Why in the world do they need all of those offices? Just does not seem like a winning combination.

But actually, today IACI made a good move selling its european operations of Match.com to Meetic.com, the leader in that market. Of course, if it was a great move, IACI would be selling the company for cash. But instead, an important part of the deal is in stock of Meetic.com. But at least, perhaps Match.com will put more energy on the US market. In my opinion, dating is one of those sectors that is very difficult to leverage. It will always be very difficult to compete against a free local website that is popular among the local population.

For example, I live in Quebec where the leader in online dating is Reseau Contact owned by Quebecor, a media company that is very well implemented in the region. So for a US or foreign company to actually make it here would require a very important budget and probably not be worth it. And unfortunately for “Global Dating websites”, it is the case in much of the world. Social networks have somehow gone past these borders mainly through the way they help connect friends not only localy but internationally, giving a more “local” feel to users.

So not a perfect move, but without any doubt a positive one as Match.com will spend less energy on Europe and perhaps try to be a leader in the US….