Archive for January, 2009

Google (GOOG) vs IAC/InteractivCorp (IACI)

By: admin | Date posted: 01.23.2009 (4:00 am)

With only 4 trades currently in, I finally got a chance today to go over numbers of a few more and decided to enter a new trade, going long Google vs Short IACI. This is basically a play on a downturn of internet advertising that is affecting IACI a lot more than it is Google.

Google, now an internet heavyweight announced its earnings a few hours ago, coming in with earnings per share of 1.21$ in its first ever quarterly decline as its results are down 67% from the same period last year. It is becomming very clear that the impact of the economic downturn is hurting the advertising business very badly as major companies are cutting their expenses, advertising being one of the easiest ones to accomplish, especially when rivals are doing the same. I am starting to see the impact of this in our internet businesses and it is increasingly clear that the whole industry is getting hurt badly. However, Google seems poised to be hurt less severely mainly for 2 reasons:

  • Up until a few months ago, Google was still more in a growth mode than in a monetization mode and that now makes a major difference. Many sections of Google did not contain any advertisements and so the recent drop in ad rates has been partly compensated by the new available spots in areas such as Google Finance or Google Maps. The recent results reflect part of this but not entirely. Another major example would be Youtube. There are no doubts that so far the acquisition by Google has not been profitable but you would have to admit that they were not putting as much energy into it either. Since its start, Google has done business by allowing new products to first gain important market share, get its users hooked and then once that happens, start to introduce ways to generate revenue streams. They seem to be slowly moving in that direction now and that will give them a major advantage in battling this downturn.
  • Google has been very innovative in how its ads are displayed and while ads displayed next to searches are still the major part of their revenues, they have been gradually adding ads in videos, in RSS feeds, on mobile content, in maps, etc. This enables them to offer a vast range of advertising options.

IAC/InteractiveCorp on the other hand is one of the most intriguing companies on the internet in that it has owned fabulous properties for a long time but has never been able to truly find its identity. When it did the spinoff of Expedia(EXPE), it was mainly to concentrate on Ask.com, its failed effort to challenge Google in the search business. After putting up massive efforts and amounts of money, IACI finally quit the race and decided to concentrate on other businesses.

But as diverisified as IACI is trying to be, they are getting hit very hard in their main areas:

-Dating: The internet dating industry is going to major changes as the business model is being revisited with many major players deciding to go back to the free model, as they are unable to compete with some other websites that offer the same service without fees. Match.com, owned by IACI will be hit hard by this and have a difficult time generating much profits.

-Search: This will have a slowdown and I would expect Ask.com to be hit more severely than Google simply because many advertisers on Ask are actually using their traffic to send back to Google (pay per click arbitrage).

-Local web: This is one area where I think InteractiveCorp might do better, it is a promising area and they do have solid properties. Their problem is that they are losing market share to Google who has a more important presence on phones, etc and have been expanding their services greatly.

Disclaimer: Author does not have any positions in GOOG or IACI

Trades updates

By: admin | Date posted: 01.22.2009 (6:38 pm)

Hello everyone, a few quick updates on the current trades:

Oct 22nd: Long AAPL: -8,78%

Oct 31st: Long EBAY: -22,81%

Nov 19th: Long BIDU/Short YHOO: +6,43% (including the half trade taken off earlier on)

Jan 9th: Long IDC/Short KNOT: +20,79% (I will close out this position tomorrow morning!)

AAPL: So far that trade has done better than the market, mainly because of the results that were announced yesterday!

So overall since in the past 3 months, including closed trades, picks are doing not bad:

Performance: -0,53%

Average compared to S&P500: +7,48%

EBAY: Stopped out of that one this morning as it reached the maximum 20% loss I’ve set on trades..!  All for now, I will update the performance of IDC/KNOT tomorrow at the open!

Valueclick (VCLK)

By: admin | Date posted: 01.21.2009 (4:00 am)

Valueclick is a stock that I have been looking at for a long time and trying to get an opinion on and still today as I write this after another extensive look at their products, I have a difficult time being convinced either way. Valueclick has been involved in internet advertising for a long time and through acquisitions mostly it was able to cover most of the different segments of internet advertising purchasing Commision Junction to offer cost per sale advertising and thus merging with its more conventional “banner advertising” that came from both Fastclick and Valueclick. It also survived the dot come bust earlier in the decade thanks to a very strong cash position and very safe management.

A lot of companies have been hurt by Google in past years but few as clearly as Valueclick. Google has basically outpaced VCLK in every possible measure such as the number of advertisers, number and quality of properties, technology, etc. I have been looking at thgeir offerings for years now trying to see how they were improving and have yet to see anything. Just look at how its main competitor Google has rolled out ads on mobile content, on non-used domains, etc, etc. In the meantime, Valueclick has been unable to generate anything new. Just look at their recent press releases and you will see that Valueclick has not announced anything since July of 2008. In an area as dynamic as internet advertising, it is very difficult to believe.

Its balance sheet is still very strong as the company has basically no debt and a very strong cash position, which in any era is a good sign, but especially right now. Their problem of course is that competitors such as Google and Microsoft are also in very strong cash positions. Recently, Valueclick has been using a lot of its cash in a stock buyback program. Of course, seeing how much value the stock has lost, it probably would have been better to wait a little longer.

The major problem lies in Valueclick’s income statements as income has been going downward for one year now in an industry that is expected to be even more challenging in 2009. I cannot imagine Valueclick being able to raise their revenue for now, especially with their different products falling behind competitors as time goes by. Valueclick is profitable and will likely remain so for some time, but as numbers continue to decrease something must change.

With a strong cash position, it would have been possible to think about possibly looking for an acquisition target but given how they’ve had problems integrating past companies perhaps the better idea would be to get bought. But with consolidation in the industry and companies such as Yahoo and Microsoft unsure of their plans in the near future, it is not easy to see who would be interesting in purchasing Valueclick… for now I’ll be a little patient with VCLK given that with such a strong balance sheet it does not have much downside

Disclaimer: I do have a position in Valueclick

More on this topic (What's this?) Read more on ValueClick at Wikinvest

Google’s new battleground

By: admin | Date posted: 01.19.2009 (4:00 am)

While this article will not result in a buy or sell recommendation, it is geared to answer some of the questions that I so often receive, mainly about Google’s growth prospects. If Google is already so dominant in search advertisement, how can it continue to increase its revenues and profits. Of course, this is no simple question and certainly one that top executives at Google spend a lot of time wondering about.

Since its debut, Google started from a Stanford thesis project to quickly become the most used search engine. Because of its simplicity, the accuracy of its searches and their smart rankings system, they have been able to take control of the market despite very strong efforts by competitiors such as Yahoo!, Microsoft, and Ask.com. Many smaller startups also (and some still do) take shots at Google, but so far, Google has continued to gain more market share, quarter after quarter. In fact, Google is now the starting point for most internet users in the world and at the center of their internet experience.

But what’s next?

Google has been going in multiple directions as it is always working on multiple different projects but I would say that there is one main direction that the company is heading towards at full speed. Google wants to go beyond being the center of our internet experience and become the center of our life. That is happening in many different ways and is often described as local search. What is it exactly? The easiest example would be someone searching for a dentist on Google and getting the results of dentists around his neighberhood. Of course, that would have value in itself.

But what if Google was able to become a lot more? Think about it just a little. Through its acquisition of technology behind Google Earth, Google entered the maps and directions market (slowly taking out Mapquest), now provides GPS technology for free, and is now even in your mobile phone through its new Android operating system.

How does that translate into more revenues? Today I was looking for directions to go to visit my mechanic and went to Google Maps, got the directions. But as well, in the map just next to those directions, I had directions to a few other mechanics in the area. And in fact, I changed my mind as I noticed that there was one that was closer. Now how much did Google make out of my idea change? Probably nothing.

But in my opinion, as Google becomes the destination for any local needs, merchants will start to gain interest and see this advertising as a possible way to get new clients. And when that happens, the merchants will be competing against each other to get the most visibility on Google which will of course translate into a new source of profits for Google.

No doubt, this future market has incredible potential, I don’t think it has any equivalent right now so it is difficult to put into numbers. Sure, we have Yellow Pages that have everything looking for. But what are the odds that you will be taking your big yellow book around with you in your car as you can do with your mobile phone?

It’s difficult to quantify but I believe it will become the new growth engine in the Google empire….

Investment Talking

By: admin | Date posted: 01.17.2009 (6:00 am)

Every Saturday, The Intelligent Speculator does a review of good read around the blogosphere. Here’s what caught my attention this week:

Dogs of the Dow at Blueprint for Financial Prosperity. This is an interesting investment strategy based on stocks from the Dow Jones.

Stock Analysis: PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at Dividends4Life

Alternative investing – Looking for Climax at StockWeb

1MansMoney from 1MansMoney presents We Don’t Bank With Them, But We Bought Their Stock

Education Still Looks Dangerous according to Zach. I guess it may not be the best timing for education company during a recession!

The Wild Investor thinks that the Dow can go lower!

Mr ToughMoneyLove from Tough Money Love presents to you his year end financial performance review.

Carnivals:

Festival of Stocks

Money Hacks Carnival

So were hedge funds that bad in 2008?

By: admin | Date posted: 01.16.2009 (4:00 am)

Today, we finally received the final numbers, the returns for the most known hedge fund index, the Credit Suisse/Tremont index that tracks over 5000 index funds. And the December returns came in basically flat as the index returned -0,03% which brings us to a total of -19,07% for the 2008 calendar year. Bad or not?

First off, just to clarify since hedge fund is such a large category, only 2 categories came out with positive returns in 2008. You will easily guess the first one:

Dedicated short bias 14,87%

Can you imagine that these funds almost disapeared in the past decade as consistent positive returns since 2001 have made life very difficult for funds that are “short” market. But investors that diversified here will be very happy with their returns.

The second category is:

Managed Futures 18,33%

These funds made solid profits from the very high volatility but also enjoyed numerous trends. Think about a fund that was long oil for a while and when the trend reversed set thgemselves short. That trade alone can make a year don’t you think?

But of couse, there are some less “solid” performances! And coming in last was Equity Market Neutral which is surprising given the fact that these funds should not be affected as much with declining markets like we saw in 2008. But irrational price movements during the year certainly hurt stock pickers…so here it goes:

Equity Market Neutral: -40,32%

Ouch! But in fact, the return is not that bad. Of course, like any investment, you have to compare. Let’s compare the total return of hedge funds, -19,07% to the return of the S&P 500, which was -38,49%! True, hedge funds did not return what they have promised for years, absolute returns (positive returns in each year no matter how the market reacts), but it did still outperform the general equity markets and in that sense, it’s easy to argue once more the power of diversification and investors that had diverisifiction across asset classes probably did much better in 2008 than others. Obviously, the best portfolio for 2008 would have been a cash portfolio or invested in government TBills, but few if any analysts would have predicted such a fate.

However, there is also another important part of the story that is the much documented and discussed Madoff fraud, which hurt the hedge fund index by creating some terrible returns (-100%) for some and highlighting a risk that has been underestimated by many hedge fund investors. Since these entities are subject to little regulation from regulators, due dilligence becomes very important and many investors have thus decided to withdraw funds from hedge funds even if returns were up to expectations.

Because of that, we expect many changes in the industry over the next few years in the financial markets, in how some products such as credit default swaps are traded but also in the regulations that hedge funds must comply with…

More on this topic (What's this?)
Hedge Fund Exits
Hedge Fund Data Management
Read more on Hedge Funds at Wikinvest