Just before discussing Valueclick, I want to do a quick comment. Last week, we had suggested going long Baidu (BIDU) against a short on Yahoo (YHOO) and while like all pics on this blog, it is a long term play, the investment returned 27,52% in 1 week* and so I would cut half of my position to take the profit, it’s a major move for a one week investment and so locking in part of it makes sense in my opinion.
*Since this trade involves no cash, we calculate return with the locked up amount on such a trade (70% of the short position).
Now back to the main subject here:

Talk about a stock getting hammered right? And for good reason. Valueclick, one of the dominant companies in the online advertising world from 4-5 years ago looks like it is slowly being swallowed by Google and others and lost a lot of its innovative power. Valueclick had most of its growth thanks to many acquisitions that have been key as they purchased assets such as Commission Junction, Fastclick in the past few years.
That gave the company an opportunity to profit in many ways. Of course, they were now able to offer advertisers access to different technologies, a much more diverse content and to do cross-selling for advertisers that would wish to combine branding, lead generation, etc. But Valueclick Inc. has been very disapointing as they have not been generating much innocation in their products which has reflected in their numbers as revenue has been flat to down in the past 2 years, something that is just not acceptable in a field that has been growing so fast. Sure, the latest quarter has seen slower growth across the industry, but in an industry that is growing at about 20%, it raises a lot of questions to see Valueclick being unable to join the growth story.
One positive in Valueclick is that they have no long term debt (have not had in their history I believe) and they are still buying back their stock believing it is cheap. It might be since it is trading at an 8 PE ratio and if it could present a more detailed idea of its future, that could make it a very attractive price at this valuation.
Another reason to own Valueclick would be based on the possibility of it being acquired. This has been in the rumors for a long time now and frankly I’m surprised it has not happened yet, but the major decline of the stock might make this possibility a lot easier for a cash rich company like Microsoft who is looking to increase its presence in the online advertising world to compete with Google.
So I would own this stock but would hope for either an acquisition rumor or a detailed plan. This would be based a low valuation and very limited downside because of its strong balance sheet.
|
In Millions of USD (except for per share items) |
3 months Ending 2008-09-30 |
3 months Ending 2008-06-30 |
3 months Ending 2008-03-31 |
3 months Ending 2007-12-31 |
3 months Ending 2007-09-30 |
|
Revenue |
152.9 |
163.83 |
176.03 |
183.12 |
156.89 |
|
Other Revenue, Total |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Total Revenue * |
*152.90 * |
*163.83 * |
*176.03 * |
*183.12 * |
*156.89 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenue, Total |
53.72 |
51.7 |
55.11 |
58.05 |
50.45 |
|
*Gross Profit * |
*99.18 * |
*112.13 * |
*120.92 * |
*125.08 * |
*106.44 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling/General/Admin. Expenses, Total |
90.59 |
66.32 |
73.36 |
78.86 |
64.67 |
|
Research & Development |
12.38 |
10.16 |
9.96 |
9.57 |
8.72 |
|
Depreciation/Amortization |
7.14 |
7.78 |
7.76 |
7.98 |
6.73 |
|
Interest Expense(Income) – Net Operating |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Unusual Expense (Income) |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
- |
|
Other Operating Expenses, Total |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Total Operating Expense * |
*163.83 * |
*135.96 * |
*146.19 * |
*154.47 * |
*130.56 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Operating Income * |
*-10.93 * |
*27.87 * |
*29.84 * |
*28.66 * |
*26.33 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income(Expense), Net Non-Operating |
-0.37 |
1.41 |
3.05 |
2.8 |
2.94 |
|
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Assets |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Other, Net |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Income Before Tax * |
*-11.29 * |
*29.28 * |
*32.89 * |
*31.45 * |
*29.27 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Income After Tax * |
*2.00 * |
*16.49 * |
*19.17 * |
*17.52 * |
*16.83 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
- |
|
Equity In Affiliates |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Net Income Before Extra. Items * |
*2.00 * |
*16.49 * |
*19.17 * |
*17.52 * |
*16.83 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting Change |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Discontinued Operations |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Extraordinary Item |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Net Income * |
*2.00 * |
*16.49 * |
*19.17 * |
*17.52 * |
*16.83 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Dividends |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Income Available to Common Excl. Extra Items * |
*2.00 * |
*16.49 * |
*19.17 * |
*17.52 * |
*16.83 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Income Available to Common Incl. Extra Items * |
*2.00 * |
*16.49 * |
*19.17 * |
*17.52 * |
*16.83 * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Weighted Average Shares |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Basic EPS Excluding Extraordinary Items * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
|
*Basic EPS Including Extraordinary Items * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution Adjustment |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Diluted Weighted Average Shares |
89.96 |
96.13 |
98.56 |
99.24 |
100.17 |
|
Diluted EPS Excluding Extraordinary Items |
0.02 |
0.17 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.17 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Diluted EPS Including Extraordinary Items * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per Share – Common Stock Primary Issue |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Gross Dividends – Common Stock |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Net Income after Stock Based Comp. Expense |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Basic EPS after Stock Based Comp. Expense |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Diluted EPS after Stock Based Comp. Expense |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Depreciation, Supplemental |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total Special Items |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Normalized Income Before Taxes * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
|
Effect of Special Items on Income Taxes |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Income Taxes Ex. Impact of Special Items |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
*Normalized Income After Taxes * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
|
*Normalized Income Avail to Common * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
*- * |
|
Basic Normalized EPS |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Diluted Normalized EPS |
0.02 |
0.17 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.17 |
Corporate bonds are safer investments, really….?
You have surely heard this, maybe not in a speculative trading account, but in a RRSP or 401K, it is generally recomended to have a portion of your portfolio in “safe investments”. The basic concept is generally explained as having a more risky portfolio when you are young so that over time you will achieve a higher return. Then, as you age, you increase the proportion of safe investments because if a stock market decline or cash occurs, you will not have as much time to make back the losses and thus not as much acceptance for risk.
The general rule is that the proportion of “safe investments” should be roughly equal to your age. Why do I write “safe investments” between quotes in this article? Because in this current crisis, we are learning a lot about investment and it’s creating a lot of questions about investment and how it should be done.
Why? Simply look at the below graph, UYG is an ETF that tracks corporate bonds. To be fair, it tracks high yield bonds. If you look at LQD, which tracks investment grade bonds (higher quality), their performance has been a lot better (-16% YTD). But still, to many, corporate bonds in general were “safe investments” and I hope that you are not reading this after seeing your retirement fund get crushed because you were holding corporate bonds that did not hold true to their objective (i.e. maintaining their value in a declining market environment). Of course, maybe that only occurs in normal market circumstances and indeed the past few months have not been “normal” by any means. But still, it is good to know and we should now stand as warned.
The blue line in the graph is HYG ETF while the red is the Dow Jones Indsutrial index.
But like most investments, the most important is to not panic. Spreads between corporate bonds and treasuries are in many ways at record levels and as the economy gets better, should improve. It’s not as clear for high yield bonds as some of those will without any doubt suffer from some defaults. Junk bonds (the most speculative bonds out there) currently trade at a yield of almost 19%, a high since such statistics exist. As the Fed and other central banks fight to improve the liquidity of the system, we see an improvement in those lending conditions for corporate companies worldwide.
Posted in Commentary | 3 Comments »